Stationed / Capabilities

Capabilities

Three ways to start. Same team behind all of them, and they tend to run into each other — a Build Day surfaces a problem, a Lab proves it's worth solving, an embedded engineer makes it permanent.

Stationed capabilities in context

The pilot that never shipped

You need proof before committing budget or headcount.

The AI tool nobody uses

Someone needs to own the path from system to workflow.

The team with no AI owner

AI has executive attention and no owner.

The workflow nobody can measure

We agree up front on what the deployment should move.

Forward-Deployed Engineering

Engineers embedded with your team, continuously finding and shipping AI systems.

Best when
AI has executive attention and no owner, or your engineering team is fully consumed by the existing roadmap.
How it runs
One or more engineers work inside your environment and your standups. They're expected to talk to stakeholders, decide what's worth building, build it, and put it in front of users. Not staff augmentation — the engineer owns the outcome, including the part where someone has to be convinced to change how they work.
What you get
Systems running in production, documentation, and your team trained to extend them.
What we need from you
Access to the people doing the work, a decision-maker who can unblock in days, and an honest definition of what "better" means.

Labs

A time-boxed sprint that runs many experiments against one function, and keeps what works.

Best when
You need proof before committing budget or headcount — and the function has enough volume that experiments produce real signal fast. Usually go-to-market.
How it runs
Ideate → build → observe → keep what works → kill what doesn't. Not a brainstorm; a Lab produces live experiments with measured outcomes. Everything that survives gets hardened into infrastructure you keep.
What you get
A set of experiments that actually ran, the results, and working systems behind the winners.

Build Days & Training

Your team builds real things with AI, on your real workflows, in a room, in a day.

Best when
AI capability inside the company is wildly uneven — a few people are far ahead and most have used a chatbot a handful of times.
How it runs
Hands-on from the start. People build something small against a problem they personally have. We're there to unstick them and to notice which problems keep coming up.
What you get
People who have shipped something, plus a ranked list of the opportunities they surfaced. That list is usually the most valuable output — the room tells us more about where AI belongs than any assessment would.

What we'll tell you not to do

Sometimes the honest answer is a database query, a deleted approval step, or a better-designed workflow — no model involved. We'll say so. Forcing AI into a problem it doesn't fit is how pilots end up as screenshots nobody uses.

Get started

Let's find the workflow worth fixing.

Bring one process that annoys everyone. We'll tell you honestly whether AI should touch it.

Book a call